In several conversations this week and it has shockingly come to my attention that many people out there still do not know some very basic and crucial points pertaining to current events and how it affects their own health. There is so much information coming at all of us daily on so many platforms, everything seems to be controversial, which causes great confusion for so many people as it is information overload.....so I empathize and I get it. I thought I would do a quick post & video to bring awareness to some very key pieces of information that you should know if you did not already know. As human beings going through these world events, the most logical approach we can do is take in as much information as possible on both sides, and then make the decision that is best for ourselves and our families, based on the information we have accumulated. You make your own opinions and descisions on the info below. I am simply reporting, and copying & pasting quotes and links. (Please be advised that I have had to misspell certain words so that my work is not censored from Big Tech, as I have been flagged several times for writing pieces exposing the truth).
Eye-opening points EVERYONE should know right now.....did you know??? 1) None of the vaxx "injections" are FDA Approved. Instead, they have been deemed EUA. What does this mean? The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a different standard than FDA Approval.
FDA Approval from the US Food and Drug Agency is an independent, scientifically reviewed approval for medical products, drugs and vaxxines. Based on substantial clinical data and evidence, the product is deemed safe, effective and able to be produced within federal quality standards.
The process for an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is different than an FDA approval. EUA is a mechanism used by the FDA to facilitate making products available quickly during a public health emergencies (like the current CVID-19 pandemic), when there is no other adequate and approved medical product available. (*Grace's note: there are indeed other medical interventions available but if any Doctor around the world talks about them, they get censored or fired. This is not the topic of today's blog post however, so I will not be elaborating on this throughout this post.)
Emergency Use Authorization allows for the use of medical products that are not yet formally approved, so that in the midst of an emergency, the products can be used to diagnose, treat or prevent serious illness or conditions. In order to give the authorization, FDA evaluates the potential risks and benefits of the products based on the scientific evidence that is available at that time. **Important note: EUAs end when the emergency declaration ends. (think about what this means in terms of vaxx passports.) They can also be revised or revoked as more data is made available. A January 6th statement from Pfizer says:
“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 16 years of age and older. The emergency use of this product is only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner.” *Right from the FDA website: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained Patricia Zettler, assistant professor of law at Ohio State University and a former FDA lawyer, explains: “I think it’s really important that patients, healthcare professionals, and the public understand that emergency use authorizations are *not* the same as standard FDA approvals or authorizations.
“Typically we think of FDA authorization as meaning that there is data and information that in the agency’s view shows the product is safe and effective for its intended use. For example, to approve a drug, FDA must determine that there is ‘substantial evidence’---consisting of adequate and well-controlled investigations---that the drug will have the effect it is intended to have. An EUA, on the other hand, can be authorized if ‘it is reasonable to believe that . . . the product may be effective.’ The EUA standard is simply a lower standard, and everyone should understand that.”
"The FDA’s “Emergency Use Authorization” allows drugmakers to skip inspections designed to ensure the safety of their manufacturing plants and operations." ~The Defender News
2) This is the biggest human experiment of all time, lacking longterm data and safety studies, estimated to end by 2023: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746 *https://vaxxter.com/new-survey-of-vaccine-free-group-exposes-long-term-impact-of-vaccination-policies-on-public-health-by-greg-glaser-and-pat-oconnell/
3) Manufacturers have ZERO liability for injuries or death: *https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html *https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html "This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in ... four years the vaccine is showing side effects," Ruud Dobber, a member of Astrazeneca's senior executive team, told Reuters. In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest," he said, adding that Astra and regulators were making safety and tolerability a top priority. ~Globe and Mail *https://pandemic.solari.com/family-financial-disclosure-form-for-covid-19-injections/
4) And here is the most monumental point ever: THE INJECTIONS DO NOT STOP THE SPREAD OR PREVENT YOU FROM GETTING INFECTED. Ummmm what? Yes that is exactly what I just said. IF YOU DO NOT ALREADY KNOW THIS THEN PLEASE KEEP READING. In each of the EUAs, the FDA has been careful to avoid any claim that the vaxxines provide protection against infection or transmission of the virus. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have each publicly stated that the vaxxines have NOT been shown to prevent infection or transmission. All of their regulatory documents and commentary addressing the issue state clearly that there is no evidence that the vaxxines affect either infection with or transmission of the virus, nor do they prevent symptoms of Cvid-19 from appearing. READ FOR YOURSELF: The FDA has stated clearly in each of the Cvid vaxxine Briefing Documents (see Moderna document here, Pfizer here, Janssen here) that the trials were not even designed to prove or disprove a hypothesis that the vaXXines prevent infection or transmission of the virus, or even prevent symptoms of Cvid-19 from developing.
Right from the WHO website on Jan 26, 2021: Does it prevent infection and transmission?
"We do not know whether the vaxxine will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission. Immunity persists for several months, but the full duration is not yet known. These important questions are being studied." ~W.H.O.
*Did you know? Recipients of the full treatment still testing positive: (everyday there are more and more stories popping up like this!) *https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/over-100-fully-vaccinated-people-in-washington-state-test-positive-for-covid-19_3757218.html *https://www.abc12.com/2021/04/06/michigan-reports-nearly-250-positive-covid-19-cases-among-vaccinated-people/ *https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/246-fully-vaccinated-michigan-residents-catch-covid-19-3-die *Roadmap to passport requirement was being mapped out in 2018. But if fully treated people can still test positive, what’s the point? (2018??!) https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf
5) Asymptomatic people have never been proven to spread disease. *https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4695 *https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w So if asymptomatic people have never been proven to spread disease, then wouldn't that make them........ummmm, healthy people? Think hard before you answer that one.
Bonus Info Tips: 6) Did you know that the WHO quietly changed their definition of 'herd immunity" in Dec 2020? Why do you think they would they do that? Let's compare the definitions:
The WHO’s definition of Herd Immunity on their webpage has removed any mention of natural immunities from its website. It has taken the additional step of actually mischaracterizing the structure and functioning of vaxxines.
*Click HERE to see: The article shows a screenshot of WHO’s “Serology” page posted in June of 2020 that is stored on archive.org, describing herd immunity as “the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.” *This is the new and current definition: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19 “What this note at the World Health Organization has done is deleted what amounts to the entire million-year history of humankind in its delicate dance with pathogens… You could only gather from this that all of us are nothing but blank and unimprovable slates on which the pharmaceutical industry writes its signature. In effect, this change at WHO ignores and even wipes out 100 years of medical advances in virology, immunology, and epidemiology… It is thoroughly unscientific. What’s even more strange is the claim that a vaccine protects people from a virus rather than exposing them to it. What’s amazing about this claim is that a vaccine works precisely by firing up the immune system through exposure." ~AIER More Points To Ponder: 7) Unfortunately, the media does not discuss this, but it is important that you consider these numbers and decide for yourself: Current adverse reactions and deaths: (Historically, however, fewer than